Also, he doesn't even hint at dealing with Correlation != Causation. Looking at the problems altogether, I get the sense this article wasn't written in good-fai

Also, he doesn't even hint at dealing with Correlation != Causation. Looking at the problems altogether, I get the sense this article wasn't written in good-faith, to just share some interesting facts. In fact, if I were to scroll down the entire way I might expect to see this fella worked for the Cato institute or something like it.