3 ms·
Very different. Hasselblad was a top choice for the pro market (and used by rich amateurs, like Leica), Minolta never really managed to breach that market (this
by frostburg 5y ago
Very different. Hasselblad was a top choice for the pro market (and used by rich amateurs, like Leica), Minolta never really managed to breach that market (this camera was the most significant attempt).
- nix23 5y agoHasselblad was the opposite of Leica, big format vs small format
- frostburg 5y agoMedium format (large format starts from 4x5 inches in modern usage), but while the professional applications were different the use by wealthy amateurs was basically the same. (I would know: https://i.imgur.com/VpC8cJB.jpg https://i.imgur.com/VpC8cJB.jpg )
- aaronbrethorst 5y agoUsing your smartphone to photograph your Hasselblad focused on your Leica is certainly a flex.