3 ms·
In this context we can exclude `trademark`. Also `copyright` is quite unlikely, too. So it's probably mostly patent impingement. And I think we all know how:
by dathinab 5y ago
In this context we can exclude `trademark`. Also `copyright` is quite unlikely, too.
So it's probably mostly patent impingement.
And I think we all know how:
- large cooperation infringe on patents of
smaller ones without relevant consequences
all the time
- there is an endless number of complete absurd
patents wrt. software. The patent system in
context of software is fundamentally broken.
- due to the US patent system being even more broken
then the German one (was at the time the article
refers to) the infringed patent might not even have
been a valid patent.
But what of this points apply to this specific case I don't know.
- __MatrixMan__ 5y agoMe neither. The only thing that really bothers me about this case is that disregarding IP law is a privilege that you can buy by hiring an army of lawyers. I wish that problematic laws could be ignored equally by all players.