3 ms·
There’s a lot of interest in superresolution imaging in quantitative microscopy, where this is definitely a huge limitation
by rsfern 5y ago
There’s a lot of interest in superresolution imaging in quantitative microscopy, where this is definitely a huge limitation
- mdp2021 5y agoI am afraid these methods ("learn the typical detail and "re"-apply it") on the said context ("obtain telling detail where we miss it") would be "dreaming" the detail. There methods are for "beauty", not to "induce real facts": what is "probable" is not what is "real". -- Edit: I have an example for you. Check https://github.com/Janspiry/Image-Super-Resolution-via-Iterative-Refinement/blob/master/misc/sr_64_512_0_hr.png https://github.com/Janspiry/Image-Super-Resolution-via-Itera... and notice the black spot under the iris of the right eye, on the left: does the actual person really have it? It is not in the blurred source image, https://github.com/Janspiry/Image-Super-Resolution-via-Iterative-Refinement/blob/master/misc/sr_64_512_0_inf.png https://github.com/Janspiry/Image-Super-Resolution-via-Itera... . Now think of an "empiricist" perceptive instrument returning that kind of "noise"... -- I understand you work on the topic (ANN for assessment), so you surely meant something different that what contextually appears.
- frumiousirc 5y agoAnd the pupils are not round which is a common telltale of some generators.