6 ms·
This thread assumes intentional reordering not that the transaction arrive at the bank out of order I have transactions that show up out of order to the event
by zaphirplane 5y ago
This thread assumes intentional reordering not that the transaction arrive at the bank out of order
I have transactions that show up out of order to the event time. Thou I wouldn’t put it past some smaller banks in low regulation geographies
- desmosxxx 5y agoI think it's pretty well documented that intentional reordering happens and still happens
- mdp2021 5y agoShould not that cause legal action - duly and factually?
- organsnyder 5y agoOnly if it's illegal.
- mdp2021 5y agoIt's a scheme with the purpose of theft. You cannot have law as a list of specific cases: it must be based on patterns - "All arbitrary appropriation is forbidden and sanctioned", then further made into distinct categories to substantiate and differentiate the amount of gravity. All theft is illegitimate.
- Arrath 5y agoWhen the transactions 'arrive' in the bank's system should be immaterial, as they should be timestamped at the moment the card is swiped, matching the date and time the printed receipt I am handed has. Regardless, the bank's mission is to make money, and they can make a lot more of it by adversely reordering transactions in their favor, it is not at all a reach to assume that they do so, and in fact have done so and may well continue to.