4 ms·

I'm curious - do you genuinely not see any reason a Zulip user would want to ensure they could avoid having cryptocurrency features added to the product?

• randomhodler84 5y ago
  I genuinely think that when one find oneself adverse to a general technology (not implementation) , while not understanding any of its benefits, history or mechanism, and one uses this position of ignorance to argue against it, and cannot see how anyone else would find it useful, one has lost. Yes.
  • NoraCodes 5y ago
    > while not understanding any of its benefits, history or mechanism I've been in crypto since I was mining on Butterfly Labs hardware in 2013. It was a scam then and it's a scam now.
    • randomhodler84 5y ago
      I want to understand why you think it is a scam. From the very first moment I bought my first sats I knew these would be super valuable, probably the most valuable thing I would ever own. I only ever mined Alts, which from a maximalist perspective seems more like a scam. Of course, it’s just perspective. The only wrong ones are the eth maximalists. :-)
  • ethanbond 5y ago
    It seems like you’re the one not responding to criticism, randomhodler84. Just point to the mysticism of “benefits, history, and mechanism” of this “general technology” and call it a day.
  • recursive 5y ago
    So, if I were to be, theoretically, adverse to a technology that has no benefits, then I lost?