5 ms·
1920x1200 is good enough for me, i don't use anything adobe, don't do graphics, etc have you looked at cpu performance or cpu-only power efficiency of the XPS
by nqzero 5y ago
1920x1200 is good enough for me, i don't use anything adobe, don't do graphics, etc
have you looked at cpu performance or cpu-only power efficiency of the XPS 17 vs M1 Pro MacBook 16 for backend work ?
- duped 5y agoThe last I heard, docker was around 2x slower than Intel macs and that performance was already pretty bad. I don't really care about power efficiency tbh, I'm plugged into the wall all day
- scoopertrooper 5y agoI don't know where you heard that, but even if we accept that assertion, it's not relevant to this conversation. We're talking about running Linux on the Mac, so you won't be paying that virtualisation penalty. There is no reason to think ARM64 containers running on an ARM64 machine would run any worse than AMD64 images running on an AMD64 machine. So given M1 Pro/Max Macs consistently rate amongst the best performing laptops on the market, you should expect a similar experience when running ARM64 containers on Linux. As more developers pick up ARM64 macs, more binaries and containers will be releasing in ARM64. There was already a massive boost in this kind of thing after the launch of the M1.
- indemnity 5y agoI want to run the same containers I deploy though, we deploy native code, and right now we are not deploying on ARM. So paying the price of Docker x86 images chomping CPU and being significantly slower is a downgrade from Intel.
- scoopertrooper 5y agoThen maybe an ARM platform isn't the right choice for you.