3 ms·
My favorite mental model for imaginary numbers is that they are placeholders or stepping stones. A speed of (30 + i*10) miles per hour is nonsense, but sometime
by 6gvONxR4sf7o 5y ago
My favorite mental model for imaginary numbers is that they are placeholders or stepping stones. A speed of (30 + i*10) miles per hour is nonsense, but sometimes in the course of calculating a nice real 40 mph, you might take a detour through some steps including complex numbers. Having them handy sure will make the derivation easier.
Same as negative numbers. I can’t be negative six feet tall, but negative feet (as a magnitude) make the calculations way easier.
You can always reformulate these derivations into derivations that don’t use e.g. imaginary numbers, but there’s no need to. If I were apointed Senior Exectutive Math Concept Namer For Humanity, I’d call them something like “algebraic placeholders” or “algebraic closure stepping stones” or something in that vein instead of “imaginary numbers.”
- jasonwatkinspdx 5y agoYeah, this is the intuition I've come to, particularly after reading Quantum Computing Since Democritus. If you'll let me be slightly hand wavy, you can get to Quantum Mechanics by generalizing probabilities in two steps: allow them to be negative, then allow them to be complex. Negative probabilities are quite unintuitive but seeing them as an accounting placeholder similar to how negative numbers are vs counting numbers helps it all click imo. The other big thing is that if you want algebraic closure you need complex numbers or something isomorphic to them.