3 ms·

> I assume I'm missing something. You are indeed, Rackets REPL is very barebones. Use Common Lisp with either SLime or Sly and Emacs.

• igouy 5y ago
  > You are indeed… How puzzling that you do not spell-out exactly what you believe they are missing.
  • dunefox 5y ago
    It should be obvious? He uses Racket, Racket has a very simple REPL, as opposed to CL which allows him to use the features he has heard mentioned about Lisp. Interactivity, short feedback loop, etc. This has been written thousands of times on here, I don't intend to repeat it here.
    • igouy 5y ago
      Are you saying the Racket REPL does not support "Interactivity, short feedback loop" ?
      • dunefox 5y ago
        Not when compared to the CL REPL, yes.