4 ms·
Strikes me as a very catchy name for the typical user, who most likely doesn't have "browser chrome" in their vocabulary already. And I doubt it'll be that har
by jeffgreco 18y ago
Strikes me as a very catchy name for the typical user, who most likely doesn't have "browser chrome" in their vocabulary already. And I doubt it'll be that hard for the rest of us to keep straight.
- cookiecaper 18y agoYou're probably right, but there are so many other potential catchy names that aren't the same as Mozilla's interface layer, so I don't know why they couldn't have just gone with one of those and made it easier on everyone.
- rbanffy 18y agoI think it may indicate the project started as a Chrome layer on top of Gecko and they decided mid-project to use WebKit instead. Just a tought. They may as well change the name.
- druswick 18y ago... but only after it's been in beta for at least 4 years.
- pxlpshr 18y agoit's the interface layer in Flex/AIR too. i don't think it's that unique to Mozilla.
- iron_ball 18y agoChrome has been called chrome since time immemorial. I remember that's what it was called in the IE-vs-Netscape days. You know, the days that drove me to become a Flash developer.