3 ms·
But it's the one you mentioned. You're just trying to move the goal posts now.
by Turing_Machine 5y ago
But it's the one you mentioned.
You're just trying to move the goal posts now.
- mro_name 5y agostrictly spoken: no. I mentioned the time it is around and not decayed yet. I didn't stress radiation, did I? Plutonium is very toxic. No more after decay, I guess. But that takes time as mentioned.
- Turing_Machine 5y agoSo is lead, and it has a half-life of infinity. You were clearly using "long half-life" to imply "super bad!" when in actuality "long half-life" means "not very radioactive at all".
- mro_name 5y agoI talked about long existence of nuclear waste. And yes, I consider plutonium super bad. And I consider keeping that safe longer than our species exists to date as ambitious. I may err and plutonium may be a kinda decaying lead as you imply.