> i thought that the "democratically elected lawmakers" are there to carry on the will of the people, not to dominate. The will of the people is supposed to do

> i thought that the "democratically elected lawmakers" are there to carry on the will of the people, not to dominate. The will of the people is supposed to dominate. > And if instead you accept the system of societal dominance in principle, then does it really that matter who is going to dominate? Yes, obviously. You're oversimplifying if you come to any other answer to that question.