I'd argue that it's both. Not that the lobbyists need to do much more than slight nudging with a sprinkle of fear mongering. Regarding the comparison with othe

I'd argue that it's both. Not that the lobbyists need to do much more than slight nudging with a sprinkle of fear mongering. Regarding the comparison with other power production methods, you are most certainly right about fossil fuels causes more harm than nuclear. Facing climate disaster it's hard to argue otherwise. Unfortunately nuclear hazards in the form of accidents are much more ominous. Invisible, immediate and easily measured. It's just a scary technology.