4 ms·
I guess another way to look at this is just another tax that you have to pay. This tactic is underhanded though in that it favors those who don't pay the tax a
by rhn_mk1 5y ago
I guess another way to look at this is just another tax that you have to pay.
This tactic is underhanded though in that it favors those who don't pay the tax and take risks without knowing the code (they have more money left if they win the gamble).
EDIT: plus, a "buy this law" tax is regressive: those who do the least work subject to this tax will bear the highest tax/unit of work costs. E.g. a private person remodelling their house will pay the same 300$ as the huge construction company.
It also creates a hurdle for new entrants, who don't have any existing connections from whom they could borrow the book.
When it comes to financing the research on law, there are ways that have better properties than those above (like a tax on work done).
- freshpots 5y agoI mean, you also need an engineering degree and a license to practice engineering there. Where does one draw the line? There are barriers to entry and requirements in most fields.
- rhn_mk1 5y agoI'd draw the line at not spreading/hiding the costs. Have the payment for the law be part of the degree (for example), instead of creating a surprise payment only after somebody already invested some time into the path.