They are lying by omission. It was WAY more than that. The prosecutor was saying that Rittenhouse must be guilty because he chose not to speak before the trial

They are lying by omission. It was WAY more than that. The prosecutor was saying that Rittenhouse must be guilty because he chose not to speak before the trial. That is an egregious violation. Judge wants a clear jury verdict due to the politicization of the case. In any other circumstances, I'd bet heavily that a mistrial with prejudice would be immediate. I'm guessing there's a non-zero chance that the prosecutor gets officially censured for this case. Between that and the testimony about coercing the witness and interfering with the detective, there's a lot of wrong stuff going on here.