3 ms·

Double Recall looks like one of the very few startups that would make the world a worse place if they succeed :(

devongall 15y ago
The other side of the coin is it could allow more content to remain accessible for free (given the stats advertisers are bound to pay more). I'd rather enter brand-specified words than my credit card info.
- thisisfmu 15y ago
  i do not think it is as clear-cut that brand advertisers will pay higher rates or even accept the format as they may think. sure, conversion/recall etc might be higher but company X making me do some annoying work is not exactly endearing them to me and tarnishes their brand. people are lazy.
nhebb 15y ago
There are a few cases where Double Recall wouldn't be so bad. For example, if I had to pick between a Double Recall interstitial and watching a commercial before a video starts, I'd go with Double Recall. I'd also prefer them to pop under ads (which, BTW, I hadn't seen in years until I switched from FF to Chrome).
jeremymims 15y ago
Keep in mind that Double Recall works with news publishers. The number one thing that publishers need is more money to pay for content production. Most publishers are toying with a paywall model right now. I hope they go the Double Recall route. I'd rather type in two words once a day and have an advertiser pay for my content than pull out my credit card to hop over a paywall. So, here's the alternative. If the Double Recalls have figured out a nice sustainable way to pay for a good chunk of the journalism you enjoy, wouldn't that make the world a better place?
- iconfinder 15y ago
  "I hope they go the Double Recall route. I'd rather type in two words once a day and have an advertiser pay for my content than pull out my credit card to hop over a paywall." Well, that depends on the price of the paywall, the quality of the content and how much you value your time, right?
  - zidar 15y ago
    Well, what people value more depends on each individual. Some people have more time than money, so DoubleRecall is perfect for them, while others have money and no time. What DoubleRecall does, is give a chance to everyone to view the article. If you take a look at a DoubleRecall client Finance, where people can still choose to pay monthly fees to get the content without DoubleRecall. Other people, like myself, can now still view the premium content without having to pay anything. I may still later decide to but a subscription and have uninterrupted access, but I probably wont, when someone else might.
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
mihar 15y ago
Depends on how you look at it I guess. We're trying to relieve people of paying for small things, like reading articles or in-app purchasing new swords :) You'll always have two options at least: - input the DoubleRecall - pay for the content If you'll hate to type in, you'll be free to lash out your card. People are willing to do to tremendous lengths just to get something for for free, especially in the case of in-app purchases in games and alike. Disclaimer: I'm a cofounder.

The other side of the coin is it could allow more content to remain accessible for free (given the stats advertisers are bound to pay more). I'd rather enter brand-specified words than my credit card info.

thisisfmu 15y ago
i do not think it is as clear-cut that brand advertisers will pay higher rates or even accept the format as they may think. sure, conversion/recall etc might be higher but company X making me do some annoying work is not exactly endearing them to me and tarnishes their brand. people are lazy.

nhebb 15y ago

There are a few cases where Double Recall wouldn't be so bad. For example, if I had to pick between a Double Recall interstitial and watching a commercial before a video starts, I'd go with Double Recall. I'd also prefer them to pop under ads (which, BTW, I hadn't seen in years until I switched from FF to Chrome).

jeremymims 15y ago

Keep in mind that Double Recall works with news publishers. The number one thing that publishers need is more money to pay for content production. Most publishers are toying with a paywall model right now. I hope they go the Double Recall route. I'd rather type in two words once a day and have an advertiser pay for my content than pull out my credit card to hop over a paywall. So, here's the alternative. If the Double Recalls have figured out a nice sustainable way to pay for a good chunk of the journalism you enjoy, wouldn't that make the world a better place?

iconfinder 15y ago
"I hope they go the Double Recall route. I'd rather type in two words once a day and have an advertiser pay for my content than pull out my credit card to hop over a paywall." Well, that depends on the price of the paywall, the quality of the content and how much you value your time, right?
- zidar 15y ago
  Well, what people value more depends on each individual. Some people have more time than money, so DoubleRecall is perfect for them, while others have money and no time. What DoubleRecall does, is give a chance to everyone to view the article. If you take a look at a DoubleRecall client Finance, where people can still choose to pay monthly fees to get the content without DoubleRecall. Other people, like myself, can now still view the premium content without having to pay anything. I may still later decide to but a subscription and have uninterrupted access, but I probably wont, when someone else might.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]

mihar 15y ago

Depends on how you look at it I guess. We're trying to relieve people of paying for small things, like reading articles or in-app purchasing new swords :) You'll always have two options at least: - input the DoubleRecall - pay for the content If you'll hate to type in, you'll be free to lash out your card. People are willing to do to tremendous lengths just to get something for for free, especially in the case of in-app purchases in games and alike. Disclaimer: I'm a cofounder.