> You argue that the marginal benefit of you doing it on your own is too little for you to do it. No, I argue that the benefit is zero, since I do not drive dr

> You argue that the marginal benefit of you doing it on your own is too little for you to do it. No, I argue that the benefit is zero, since I do not drive drunk, and the device will prevent exactly zero instances of drunk driving. > And they propose to make millions of people waste this money when they don't believe in it enough to do it for themselves. Please re-read my post. I explained the reasoning there already. The point is that: a) We do not know who needs to have this installed. b) That means the only way for it to be effective is to make everyone install it. c) However, I know that I am not one of those who needs it installed, therefore, there is zero benefit to me installing it on my own. All of this is perfectly non-hypocritical.