3 ms·
> logical conclusion regarding the spiky yearly activity Why is it logical? There’s tons of changes being deployed at all times, at all large companies. Acros
by yunohn 5y ago
> logical conclusion regarding the spiky yearly activity
Why is it logical? There’s tons of changes being deployed at all times, at all large companies.
Across products, verticals, everything - hundreds of changes at any given point. Some of these changes can introduce hard-to-predict bugs in globally distributed systems. Most of the time, external users don’t even notice before they’re fixed.
Like another commenter said, performance reviews do not coincide with with the year-end at Google and other companies.
- oblio 5y ago> Like another commenter said, performance reviews do not coincide with with the year-end at Google and other companies. When are they? My bet is that they're roughly around the same time period, even if they don't start or close on December 31st.
- michaelt 5y agoHypothetically speaking? 11 months a year there's no incentive to cut corners and only do 2 weeks of testing on something that really needs 3. If one month a year rushing things out with a bit less testing is rewarded, I can believe some people would respond to that. Of course, I wouldn't go as far as to call this a "logical conclusion" as the evidence I've seen is very slim.
- fragmede 5y agoExcept that there are two a year at Google., so it's 10 months of the year, 5 and 5, and Covid's made everything weird.