3 ms·
I'm curious why the time is so much worse for sizes just slightly larger than 400, but then better again for sizes larger than this?
by jstanley 5y ago
I'm curious why the time is so much worse for sizes just slightly larger than 400, but then better again for sizes larger than this?
- MauranKilom 5y agoCould be hitting a critical cache stride. See also https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11413855/why-is-transposing-a-matrix-of-512x512-much-slower-than-transposing-a-matrix-of https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11413855/why-is-transpos...