4 ms·
Graeber was certainly not Marxist. And the whole nature of his new book and the rest of his work is the opposite of the idea of portraying history as a "sequenc
by quadrangle 5y ago
Graeber was certainly not Marxist. And the whole nature of his new book and the rest of his work is the opposite of the idea of portraying history as a "sequence" of acts at all let alone defining them in some just/unjust binary.
- Jeff_Brown 5y agoHow could history not be a sequence of acts?
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoHow could there be more than one source of a river? How can one one river enter the sea in more than one place?