He adds: Many of these leaders, were leaders not on their merit, success or competency, but simply because they stayed at the company long enough that their ti

He adds: Many of these leaders, were leaders not on their merit, success or competency, but simply because they stayed at the company long enough that their titles grew as the company did. Curious how people at FAANG and other midsized to large technology companies feel about this. Can we look at a company like Google and find senior people who rose through the ranks not so much because of talent or intelligence or leadership qualities but rather because they stuck around long enough? Or is this something found mainly in toxic companies like the author described Zillow to be?