4 ms·

This is really expensive for the server (the unshallow step specifically). Consider a partial clone here instead.

• williamvds 5y ago
  Is unshallowing any more expensive than a normal clone? The shallow clone is for the benefit of the user so they can get to work sooner.
  • vtbassmatt 5y ago
    It is, because of the way the server has to recompute packfiles. I realize that you may choose to optimize for the user over the server, but a partial (blobless) clone should satisfy both.
    • erik_seaberg 5y ago
      Does the server rule out sending a packfile that you only need 95% of? That seems like a good thing to optimize.