4 ms·
See https://fullstackeconomics.com/how-luxury-apartment-buildings-help-low-income-renters/ https://fullstackeconomics.com/how-luxury-apartment-building... for t
by jseliger 5y ago
See https://fullstackeconomics.com/how-luxury-apartment-buildings-help-low-income-renters/ https://fullstackeconomics.com/how-luxury-apartment-building... for the empirical research refuting that point and agreeing with the basic supply-demand issue. The issue in Toronto is not just the anecdotal "new condo buildings" but how much housing Toronto has built per capita for the last several decades, which is almost certainly "too little." See the link in my original post to data from Tokyo, which is one of the few cities to have done housing right.
"Filtering" has always been a housing phenomenon: https://cityobservatory.org/what-filtering-can-and-cant-do/ https://cityobservatory.org/what-filtering-can-and-cant-do/ and https://cityobservatory.org/how-luxury-housing-becomes-affordable https://cityobservatory.org/how-luxury-housing-becomes-affor....
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- atweiden 5y ago> See [...] for the empirical research refuting that point and agreeing with the basic supply-demand issue The issue I have with this analysis is where does it end? For example, if you assume most people eventually want to live in a townhome or similar, packing people in like sardines in the name of housing affordability is a kick-the-can solution. The unstated assumption of these researchers is it’s perfectly fine for every major urban area to morph into Hong Kong given a long enough time frame.
- Redoubts 5y agoCan we have just one Hong Kong then? You have 99% of America catering to your needs, why make it 100%?