Probably an unpopular opinion, but I've followed Balaji for a couple years and haven't derived much value. He's very good at writing Tweets and spinning narrat

Probably an unpopular opinion, but I've followed Balaji for a couple years and haven't derived much value. He's very good at writing Tweets and spinning narratives that are popular among his followers, but his writings have this grandiose nebulosity that makes them feel like deep, intellectual writings while simultaneously not really delivering much of substance. Or the concepts are so high-level or only addressing something so far off in the future that there's little room for practical conversation. For example, from one of your linked Tweet threads: > The pseudonymous economy is preferable to ritualistic announcements of immutable characteristics. Okay but why? That video (while I disagree with their decisions) wasn't the "woke" crisis that everyone thought, but rather a ham-fisted attempt to include more narration for the benefit of audio-only listeners. The execution was dumb, but it's more of a fumble than a harbinger of some epic societal shift that Twitter users like to use as a springboard for pseudo-intellectual rants.