I'm glad at how so many people - the performers, the women - are willing to ignore all of this and provide personalized erotic entertainment as the progressives

I'm glad at how so many people - the performers, the women - are willing to ignore all of this and provide personalized erotic entertainment as the progressives liberalize the supply side and aim to make that safe. The only thing happening here is that I'm pointing out that the discussion of the demand side is comparatively immature. The performers all know the analytics showing such a wide population of consumers. The consumers are mostly silo'd and don't know the breadth of it. Everyone just nods and agrees with the people saying exclusionary prohibitory things so as not to be targeted and vilified as "the creepiest thing". But I think I'm in a good position to help normalize this already existing reality, as I have practically zero consequences aside from a post potentially losing consensus and visibility in tech circles. "Use your platform! Silence is violence!" As the leftists say. To your point, we share the observation that some people exclude forms of female empowerment that overlap with the patriarchy. But its just a venn diagram. From my perspective, the empowerment goal has always been "choice", which some people distort to "not that choice!" because they meant the choice of exploitative labor for a FAANG. The population is actually broad enough to flip on this very fast. They just don't know yet!