> It was probably someone assigned to "encourage user-retention". The ticket would certainly not be named "Ignore user's default browser choice", but only an e

> It was probably someone assigned to "encourage user-retention". The ticket would certainly not be named "Ignore user's default browser choice", but only an extremely naive developer would believe this is good for their users. A developer that finds this objectionable would ask to be transferred to another team, but most won't. I'm not saying that developers should refuse the work, just that they're not innocent about what they're doing.