4 ms·

You are strongly whitewashing your own comments. Your first comment - as mentioned re: personal agendas - was about 75% dedicated to to railing against Californ

• chrisseaton 5y ago
  > derogatory to the article I’m really not sure how you managed to take that away from the top level comment! I didn't say anything derogatory about it if you re-read it. I think you're possibly bringing in some kind of preconception. The article is important but its impact is watered down by people making ‘cancer-causing’ a daily warning. That was the point.
  • nawgz 5y ago
    You are a sad person to use language like such a snake > I didn't say anything derogatory about it if you re-read it he says in response to a comment clearly outlining why it reads as derogatory regardless of author intention, ignoring those points to instead imply I am the problem. > The article is important but its impact is watered down by people making ‘cancer-causing’ a daily warning. That was the point. You can't really tell me that was the point - where do you suggest the article is important in your initial comment? Answer with a quotation please. To me, and any reasonable reader, the point was that you hate California, and everything else was just a weak justification to make that comment on this article.