3 ms·
I was wondering if there was any similar conversation going on way way back when compilers were a new thing - found this gem by Grace Hopper (1958) (yeah THAT G
by hospadar 5y ago
I was wondering if there was any similar conversation going on way way back when compilers were a new thing - found this gem by Grace Hopper (1958) (yeah THAT Grace Hopper).
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ie50587a038 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ie50587a038
She's talking about the difference between "programmer" (one who designs logic and processes) from "coder" (one who converts those processes to "codes" - i.e. assembly) and how compilers have the potential to eliminate the need for "coders"
I'm tickled by the (IMO) obvious parallels that have just moved up a few levels in complexity us who use text editors to write programs are often supporting configurable logic for someone downstream who can get work done with less complexity using simpler, more accessible tools.
- waltbosz 5y agoI first learned of Grace Hopper from a children's book I read to my kids. Recently, I've been wondering what kinds of Hopperesque ease-of-coding advancements are still left to be invented. For example, are there advancements to made in syntax highlighting to make code read more like a natural language, and bugs easier to spot. (I'm explaining my thoughts poorly, text is the wrong medium). Also: I Ctrl+F-ed "Grace" on the main page of this post knowing I'd find a hit.