3 ms·
The problem is that you can’t usually afford to target just a Windows 95 PC or equivalent today so such a tool cannot exist. The UI must morph and adapt and fee
by redisman 5y ago
The problem is that you can’t usually afford to target just a Windows 95 PC or equivalent today so such a tool cannot exist. The UI must morph and adapt and feel native across phones, tablets, retina displays, etc.
Even video games these days need to adapt to a different UX on each platform even thou they are the closest to having one unified UI across the gamut
- mikewarot 5y agoIt's unrealistic to expect a full, productive, desktop experience on any smaller devices. Giving up on the desktop is a huge step backwards.
- oneplane 5y agoOn the other hand, the market has expanded beyond economies where users have the space, power and physical safety to actually own a desktop. For some people their first, last and only "PC" is their smartphone. Your choice then becomes embracing those users or not having those users at all.
- bitwize 5y agoI like typing stuff in and instantly seeing the results, rather than rat wrestling widgets onto a form. Rat wrestling also makes adaptive UIs difficult; again, the solution is being able to declare your UI with layout managers that apply constraints. The most rapid UI tool I've ever encountered is Tcl/Tk. Everything else involves incurring more tedium and misery -- even Visual Basic or Delphi.
- lowbloodsugar 5y agoDelphi is alive! https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi
- airstrike 5y ago> The UI must morph and adapt and feel native across phones, tablets, retina displays, etc. Isn't that a solved problem by the likes of React Native?