4 ms·
It'd be more fun if I could do it in something that wasn't in Javascript or one of its Frankenstein cousins.
by MisterBastahrd 5y ago
It'd be more fun if I could do it in something that wasn't in Javascript or one of its Frankenstein cousins.
- tempest_ 5y agoYou can! Elm is interesting, though it's developer is a bit polarizing Also there are a host of nascent Rust/WASM frameworks starting to pop up. They really like the tree puns. There is Yew, Sycamore and Seed.
- clivestaples 5y agoI do React for my day job. For personal projects and MVPs, I came back to Rails and it has been insanely fun. I can drop in whatever frontend framework I want or none at all.
- slantyyz 5y agoWith Sveltekit, you can actually build your back end with it as well. The path based routing is so nice and intuitive (compared to my recollection of Rails 3.x), and if you compile your SvelteKit application with the node adapter, it will include a back-end server too. The only catch of course, is that you have to like both Svelte and NodeJS.
- jhgb 5y agoIs there any reason why something like Svelte couldn't be written in one of the lisply languages? The compiler approach seems definitely like a good fit.
- rglover 5y agoJavaScript-based but plain HTML/CSS/JS. No Mary Shelley: https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick