Do we know what the cost is? Seems to me that would depend on a lot of factors, such as how expensive the equipment is, how expensive it is to repair/replace, w

Do we know what the cost is? Seems to me that would depend on a lot of factors, such as how expensive the equipment is, how expensive it is to repair/replace, what the false positive rates are, what the consequences of a false positive are, what other additional burdens/inconveniences it imposes on the driver, etc. If it's cheap enough (after considering all of the above) then yeah, maybe something like this could make sense. I do feel like it should be up to the ones proposing the legislation to prove that though before any new regulations are passed. Unfortunately, I suspect the fact that this measure is being bundled together with a trillion dollar spending package makes that unlikely.