I happened to tune on during the part of the live trial. At first was funny seeing them using works like logarithms incorrectly, but then the other side didn't

I happened to tune on during the part of the live trial. At first was funny seeing them using works like logarithms incorrectly, but then the other side didn't do a great job at explaining either. As he kept saying everyone pinches and zooms and knows what that does so no expert is needed. But just because people all use the feature, that doesn't mean the average person would know if ai is enhancing/inserting pixels to do that or not. Because of this poor argument, later on when he finally starts to touch more on the reality that it has to do with resolution and you are just zooming in our out of full resolution... it was too late, since the by then the judge was confused enough and lacked confidence in both sides to hear it. The magifying glass example didn't seem like a good way to explain that. And finally while pinch to zoom is just bring you close to the real full resolution, off the top of my head, I'm not sure if you keep zooming into the deepest detail if say Apple Photos, etc, does apply any techniques of inserting pixels to show even larger or if stops at the max resolution. Or if the user has accessibility modes on if that further amplifies beyond the available data. And whether that's via linear interpolation like watching an evidence photo on a big screen tv or a different technique. So depending on how much they are zooming in, etc, it's not a completely crazy question to ask. But they could have probably just googled and got answers to that pretty quickly.