3 ms·
Your needless sarcasm belies the fact that you either missed or are ignoring that the OP's concern was about large persistent dust clouds obscuring major featur
by colanderman 5y ago
Your needless sarcasm belies the fact that you either missed or are ignoring that the OP's concern was about large persistent dust clouds obscuring major features. Not pockmarks.
You've been here ten years, so I would think you're familiar with HN guidelines [1], but please remember:
> Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- politician 5y agoThere's a group of folks here that believe we should eliminate all exploration for the sake of ambiguous and vague goals of "preservation". They pop up in every discussion of the future, demanding explanations for why people of whom they have no affiliation should use resources of which they have no ownership for purposes over which they have no reasonable control. Consider directing your volunteer HN moderation at that absurdity.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]