4 ms·
That order is not guaranteed consistent across installations, however.
by floatingatoll 5y ago
That order is not guaranteed consistent across installations, however.
- marginalia_nu 5y agoI wonder if code to this effect has ever been written before for (int i = 1; i < INT_MAX; i++) { if (dirExists("C:\\PROGRA~%d\\ProgramName", i)) {
- gmfawcett 5y agoAnd that, children, is when marginalia_nu unlocked the seventh circle of the inferno. Tomorrow we'll read the story of how our new demon overlords forced us all back to Windows 3.1.
- jagged-chisel 5y agoWin 3.1? on DOS 6.22? Actually, this sounds like heaven. Just don't put it on the public 'tubes.
- floatingatoll 5y agoOr do. Can’t hack a Mac Classic web server!
- marginalia_nu 5y agoGot to tweak HIMEM.SYS before the slumbering one can be awakened.
- aksss 5y agoPEEK and POKE could break the HIMEM.
- floatingatoll 5y agoFor whatever it’s worth, this is a terrible idea, for so many different reasons: https://web.archive.org/web/20100107184218/http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/04/14/113052.aspx https://web.archive.org/web/20100107184218/http://blogs.msdn... And so, yes, I’m certain someone must have done it, because it’s clearly bad idea jeans and so Murphy’s Law says it must exist.
- benibela 5y agoCan that work for i > 9 ?
- floatingatoll 5y agoIf you mkdir PROGRA~10, yes!