Oops. Now realize I omitted key words. Its should read something like: > Perhaps if the courts allow individuals harmed by Freedom Speeches™ to sue for damages

Oops. Now realize I omitted key words. Its should read something like: > Perhaps if the courts allow individuals harmed by Freedom Speeches™ to sue for damages , we won't need draconian hate speech laws and such. Jill Lepore has me reevaluating my support for laws banning hate speech. While I support the end goal, stopping verbal assaults, I'm very open towards other legal solutions. Like perhaps the courts can broaden the scope of libel and defamation. Again, not excited about that. Overly broad, and we end up with UK style censorship. It's a tough problem. But I'm confident we can find a balance.