3 ms·
> They didn't have recorders or scanners, just sit on a known frequency and wait for the Japanese to transmit something Weird, I could have sworn that there we
by jhgb 5y ago
> They didn't have recorders or scanners, just sit on a known frequency and wait for the Japanese to transmit something
Weird, I could have sworn that there were already some (admittedly primitive) scanners in WW II. At least here in Europe.
- Johnythree 5y agoDepends what you mean by "scanner". I think the OP was referring to receivers that could rapidly scan a multitude of channels, then stop if one became busy. They did exist early on, but weren't really practical till synthesized (and programmable) oscillators arrived. Some military receives had mechanical push-button tuning, but programming new channels was cumbersome and slow. Of course you could just use a bank of receivers, but you need an operator at each RX, else you'll miss most of the traffic. Especially if more than one channel becomes busy. Bottom line, having access to scanners doesn't fix the problem.