Thanks for the clarification, but you can't really remove the fundraising from a conversation about whether the financials are justified, because that is litera

Thanks for the clarification, but you can't really remove the fundraising from a conversation about whether the financials are justified, because that is literally one half of the topic. This is especially true when it comes to criticisms of the financials that you're side-stepping, such as >20% of the revenue not even going to Wikimedia. To boil it down, somebody asked "are their expenses really that high" and you responded with "yes" even though the evidence says otherwise. You can name all of the individual expenses you want, but their existence does not automatically equate to justification.