And it hopefully also means that Google will feel some more urgency about iterating, too. And maybe even some incentive to figure out a better way to deal with

And it hopefully also means that Google will feel some more urgency about iterating, too. And maybe even some incentive to figure out a better way to deal with pseudonyms. They seem to have lost plenty of good will and not a small number of users over the issue. And, I'm sure everyone has a list of features they want in G+. Ultimately, I'm still hoping for a Wave-style open standards/federation based interoperability for G+. I can imagine what a struggle it is to decide on a final feature set to actually release openly, though. And some features just seem impossible. Like tag-approval. In an open, distributed system, can you stop someone from, essentially, linking to you? That's like trying to stop someone from posting your email address, right?