3 ms·
>It ignores the fact that a lot of products wouldn't be used, and content wouldn't be consumed, if they weren't free. This is why I said we are on Hacker News.
by moonchrome 5y ago
>It ignores the fact that a lot of products wouldn't be used, and content wouldn't be consumed, if they weren't free.
This is why I said we are on Hacker News. People here should probably value their time more than 15$/month if they spend nontrivial amount of time watching YT, yet still refuse to pay, freeloading is a common thing unfortunately.
- sokoloff 5y agoI’m no more a freeloader watching ads on YouTube than I am a freeloader watching broadcast TV or listening to FM radio in my car.
- mitigating 5y agoMaybe he meant to say freeloader while complaining or blocking the ads.
- monkeywork 5y agoI think you missed the point the person you are replying to is talking about - if you are watching youtube normally and seeing ads you aren't a freeloader. They are saying those that would use apps like vance or newpipe instead of just paying for premium are the freeloaders
- sokoloff 5y agoAh. You’re right and thanks. I had read that post, but from the use of the trademark assumed that YouTube Vanced was some other YouTube offering that I also didn’t care about, not that it was a 3rd party app that bypassed ads.
- BizarroLand 5y agoI put a book on a table in a library and every time someone reads it, it costs me a penny. However, every time someone reads it I am also paid 2 pennies by a dude that wants to tell people about his new book. People were fine with that, so I also found another guy to pay me 2 pennies to talk about the book he wrote as well. A negligibly small fraction of those people have started wearing earplugs. How unfair! So I found a third guy to pay me 2 pennies to talk about the book he wrote as well, and more people started wearing earplugs! What the heck!?!