3 ms·
I still haven't seen a good implementation of Internet video yet. YouTube is great for the one offs, the funny things that people catch on camera. But as Goog
by demallien 18y ago
I still haven't seen a good implementation of Internet video yet.
YouTube is great for the one offs, the funny things that people catch on camera. But as Google has discovered, it is difficult to make money out of that stuff. Only live streaming is available, too bad if you're on the train on the way home. There is little support for following a 'program'. If you want to see if a content producer you like has done something new, you have to visit YouTube.
On the plus side, YouTube has made it fantastically easy to publish work, and to embed stuff in other web pages - most of my viewing of YouTube clips is done because I see the clip on some other web page.
Hulu is only available in the US, and it only offers live streaming. Again, too bad if you want to watch somewhere when you are out and about. After all the effort that we have put into time-and-place shifting our media, this feels like a big step backwards for me.
Podcasts allow you to watch offline, and they allow you to easily follow when new episodes become available. But there is no service offering impromptu YouTube-like serving of clips - you see a cool episode of a show that you want to share on your blog, then you're out of luck. From the Content Provider's perspective this is a problem too - having people embed your clip on their webpage is the best advertising you could wish for if you want people to subscribe to your podcast. The whole subscribing thing is important too when it comes to obtaining advertising dollars - you'll have much more success negotiating a price for ads in your podcast if you can show that you have a large audience already subscribed.
- gasull 18y agoHulu is only available in the US You can work around this with Blossom: http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/06/blossom-tor-and-touring-the-internets/ http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2006/04/06/blossom-tor-an...
- unalone 18y agoHulu has flaws, yes. However, they're not trying to do everything at once. Right now, they're trying to offer high-quality programming in place of each company having a separate site. Offline watching would be great and all, but that's not an enormous setback, sorry. That's not a necessary feature, that's a luxury. I was deadset against Hulu when it was first announced, as was essentially the entire Internet. I think it's one of my most-visited sites, now. The presentation is top-notch: few sites look or work better. And the video content is all to die for. Even the social aspects are excellent. They stay out of the way unless you really care, and they tie into Facebook, which means that they've got a good social plug-in for when you want to send things over to friends. If you want a good video site, though, check out Vimeo. Grossly underrated site, and it's got excellent features and content.