3 ms·
Even worse: the existence of this feature (now merged) can be used to justify writing crappy code, because this is the "security" mechanism (as opposed to the p
by gregmac 5y ago
Even worse: the existence of this feature (now merged) can be used to justify writing crappy code, because this is the "security" mechanism (as opposed to the proper way: not sending the answers to the client).
The existence of badly-written apps that rely on this crutch become justification for keeping this stupid feature in.
Lazy admins will use `view-source: *` rather than blocking specific sites.
So frustrating: Everyone doing bad/lazy things 'wins', and the users suffer because now these devices basically can't be used to learn or do web development.