3 ms·
I agree with the sentiment Bonaldi's post in spite of your reply. I read the security page, and while I understand that there are "safeguards" in place to say
by dangero 15y ago
I agree with the sentiment Bonaldi's post in spite of your reply.
I read the security page, and while I understand that there are "safeguards" in place to say that the founders can't read my email, I find that kind of like me saying that I can't browse porn because I installed a porn web browser filter on my PC. I have all the passwords, so I can choose to turn that off at any time.
If I sign up for your service, your servers contain plain text copies of all of my data. If it's not in plain text, then it's encrypted with a key that you hold so you can decrypt it for indexing.
I think there is a market for technology like this, but I think it would be more turnkey solutions for businesses so that they can own and monitor access to their servers and data. Is this a direction you are considering?
- rwalker 15y agoI completely understand what you're saying. In your metaphor, our system is more like this: all "porn" I access is logged (and this log is sent to my wife) and only she and I together can unlock the filter. More succinctly: no single person here has all the passwords. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamirs_Secret_Sharing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamirs_Secret_Sharing