4 ms·

It’s embarrassing The Guardian posted a link to a 10. Address. :facepalm

• dec0dedab0de 5y ago
  I wonder how that is even possible. I just checked, they have different parent companies. Maybe that is an internal proxy/cache address? Possibly for getting around the paywall? Or maybe they paid/arranged for an internally proxied SAML connection?
  • r00fus 5y ago
    It's clearly a mistake - either the article was downloaded onto the author's network (and internal link provided) or simply the wrong URL.
    • smnrchrds 5y ago
      It helps that if you are not paying attention, it looks like a DOI.
  • aaron695 5y ago
    Somehow 10.1038 resolves to 10.0.4.14 -> https://www.google.com/search?q=1038+%2210.0.4.14%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=1038+%2210.0.4.14%22 Puzzle for the day. (If you don't know DOI's - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier important for looking up science articles, SciHub is one example. It might not be mathematical, it might be a API - https://doi.org/10.1038 https://doi.org/10.1038 )
• labster 5y ago
  The Sun posted a 10 too, but she was on page 3.