2 ms·
Chomsky's filters are relevant, but they are almost a baseline and since the 2000's there are much worse kinds of filters. Fox, and especially in the 2010's an
by jollybean 5y ago
Chomsky's filters are relevant, but they are almost a baseline and since the 2000's there are much worse kinds of filters.
Fox, and especially in the 2010's and especially since Trump, MSNBC, CNN, the Atlantic - all of them have become a bit unhinged.
The bold postmodern claims being thrown around as 'news' is jaw dropping, and they're all guilty.
I can't watch the news about a single event without assuming I will be misinformed, usually in some sneaky way.
If all we had to deal with were Chomsky's filters we'd be mostly fine.
I am confident we'll be able to reel in Alex Jones, I'm not sure about just the regular, harmful, cynical stuff.
And FYI - net-net - because the press has such a bigger audience than Alex Jones, and they lie a lot, they are kind of as guilty.
I hope they settle down in the coming years as Trump fades a bit into history.