3 ms·
Would you trust YT to define what a "small creator" is? It opens the door to other policies being applied only to "small creators" as well, and I don't personal
by jedimastert 5y ago
Would you trust YT to define what a "small creator" is? It opens the door to other policies being applied only to "small creators" as well, and I don't personally like that thought
- weberer 5y agoThey already do that. They don't pay creators at all who have less than 1000 subscribers and 4000 watch hours in the past year.
- ridaj 5y agoYou also cannot have comments on videos that feature or target children
- jedimastert 5y agoThat's a response to a legal requirement
- scoopertrooper 5y agoThey already apply different rules to small creators. For instance, you must have 1000 subscribers and 4000 hours of watch time per a year in order to monetise videos.
- jedimastert 5y agoThat's not even close to what "small creator" would mean on YT
- scoopertrooper 5y agoMy point was that your slippery slope argument was a bit bonkers because YouTube already has a mechanism to impose varying rules on channels based on size.