> It's hard to say Fukushima was a case of "doing it wrong." If you tsunami safety plan in a country prone to have tsunamis fits in one page and has not been u

> It's hard to say Fukushima was a case of "doing it wrong." If you tsunami safety plan in a country prone to have tsunamis fits in one page and has not been updated in the last 9 years to include the new scientific data, yes, you are doing it wrong. If your plans calculate less than 6m high waves as a maximum and there is a 14m high wave event. If your calculus failed for more than 50%, not, this is not a good job. You could have done much more. Can blame the nature or the bad luck, or the constellations, but you are just lying to yourself.