3 ms·
Okay, then you definitely couldn’t include anything more than the 5 nuclear-weapon states.
by tshaddox 5y ago
Okay, then you definitely couldn’t include anything more than the 5 nuclear-weapon states.
- zardo 5y agoThere are at least nine.
- quacked 5y agoConcur
- quacked 5y agoNot strictly true; states that have nuclear weapons are capable of destroying other states, but not necessarily invading, repurposing, and ruling them to the point that their own legal and governmental system is subsumed by the other.