3 ms·
I keep thinking about the Silicon Foundry days, about how chipmaking arose so strongly in the US by giving students access to foundries & technology & letting t
by rektide 5y ago
I keep thinking about the Silicon Foundry days, about how chipmaking arose so strongly in the US by giving students access to foundries & technology & letting them explore.
Now that we're so much more advanced it's hard to imagine how something like this could apply or work again. Google bankrolling some runs of 130nm chips is one of the rare few examples we have, of accessible means to re-learning how to make chips. But whatever it takes, I feel like the US must create not just chipmaking capabilities, but conditions for talent to arise & develop & grow; we must re-create the Silicon Foundry. We've got to put these capabilities into the hands of our people, people of all kinds.
My ideal bill includes provisions that these fabs have to provide some runs to small to entities/schools, and has to have like 1/3rd or 1/2 their output be open to whomever. If the goal is only to make more chips, the US is not going to create a sustainable chipmaking pipeline. It won't develop the talent & knowledge that is essential to being a capable, competent power at chipmaking.
Morris Chang, founder of TSMC, outlined four advantages Taiwan has. Talent was the top[1]. Taiwan is a country rich chipmaking knowledge, there's seemingly no pool of talent like it. The US can't simply fund our way through this problem, can't create effective competition just by throwing money at companies: we need to create the conditions for ongoing success. We need to create our own talent. Open fabs are needed to allow new companies & talents to grow. Giving students & learners access to chipmaking is required to create the lifelong dedication & pursuits that great great yields. Currently there is little access to the means to personal success in chipmaking, and the US needs to change that, if it want's to turn things around.
[1] https://interconnected.blog/morris-chang-global-semiconductor-competition-make-making-stuff-cool/ https://interconnected.blog/morris-chang-global-semiconducto...
- mountain_peak 5y agoIt's also interesting to look at how Taiwan historically built knowledge and expertise in technology manufacturing. In the mid- to late-1970s (far before Korea entered the fray), Taiwan was the global epicenter of illegal clone manufacturing. Markets around the world - but especially Hong Kong - had a steady supply of cheap Taiwan-made Apple and (later) IBM clones. The ironic part of the story is that cloning provided Taiwan with manufacturing expertise, and in short order, they were awarded legal contracts to manufacture legal computers from US companies for export to Europe and America. The Taiwanese government sent Taiwanese engineers to the US for training, and they returned to kickstart companies such as Acer, which originally started out manufacturing OEM clones for Canon and Siemens, but later started releasing computers under its own brand. The conditions for incubating talent in Taiwan arose from piracy and a demand for cheap computers and parts - not sure if there's any modern equivalent to start the next wave of talent in Europe and North America.
- m4rtink 5y agoPush for more open hardware and software so that people can manufacture whatever withou interferrence from corporate monopolies ?