3 ms·
How do you measure accuracy? Is there another way the man can communicate? edit: The researchers compared the BCI output to a prompt that T5 was supposed to re
by clircle 5y ago
How do you measure accuracy? Is there another way the man can communicate?
edit: The researchers compared the BCI output to a prompt that T5 was supposed to restate. I was thinking that T5 was communicating without prompts in the experiment. This isn't my idea of translation accuracy, but you've got to have some baseline.
- ceejayoz 5y ago"A man paralyzed from the neck down due to a spinal cord injury" typically can still talk. If not, there's blinking/mouth controls like Stephen Hawking.
- Levitz 5y agoIt would also be easy enough to make him memorize some text and attempt to replicate it, would it not?
- cgriswald 5y agoNo. You’re trying to measure whether the machine is accurately translating his thoughts into characters. He may make errors in spelling or memory. Success is whether the machine spits out the characters he intended, even if they weren’t the ones he was supposed to send.
- excalibur 5y agoSurprised at how far I had to scroll to find Hawking's name. If he were still with us I bet he could type circles around this guy.
- graindcafe 5y agoSame way autospell is not working with 100% accuracy and you're still managing to express yourself, I believe