3 ms·
Maybe, but "a community that really valued anonymous posting" is likely to be defined by this value. The first "problem" is that likely use cases are users/comm
by netcan 5y ago
Maybe, but "a community that really valued anonymous posting" is likely to be defined by this value. The first "problem" is that likely use cases are users/comments/topics that aren't allowed elsewhere. So.. that community will tend to be a haven for whatever content other sites have actively ejected.
That doesn't make it impossible to have anonymous accounts, but it is a high tradeoff decision and likely a defining one.
I think it's more applicable for sites that have somewhat more objective and/or legible goals. Wiki-ish sites, for example. If there's a lot of free form discussion... anonymity is probably a bad decision for the site owner.
- evandwight 5y agoOne of the amazing things about Reddit is how different communities compete with each other. Allowing individual subreddits to enable anonymous posting lets the market decide if the pros outweigh the cons. (If the subreddit has a history of bad moderation, ban the subreddit) I feel like giving communities more options in customizing the algorithm that dictates the discussion is powerful.
- netcan 5y agoYeah. Reddit's structure gives us a lot of insight.